OBJEEEEEECTION!
I motion for a new trial! This case has been left open for so long, all the small details were forgotten, including who was the defense and who was judge. Not only did this reveal the judge has a bias for the defendant, but it also means Ess was never assigned the attorney he has the right to have before judgement. His confession was made before he was promised the right to an attorney, and should be thrown out of court! (I was judge, never officially his attorney, a gross mistake).
New details regarding the case were brought into light as well, which makes it impossible to completely judge him on what little we know.
This case can either be thrown out and the pokemon goes free, or we can set a new trial with a fresh picture to work with.
In the interest of justice it would be unlawful to continue this session and this trial in its current state!
I motion for a new trial! This case has been left open for so long, all the small details were forgotten, including who was the defense and who was judge. Not only did this reveal the judge has a bias for the defendant, but it also means Ess was never assigned the attorney he has the right to have before judgement. His confession was made before he was promised the right to an attorney, and should be thrown out of court! (I was judge, never officially his attorney, a gross mistake).
New details regarding the case were brought into light as well, which makes it impossible to completely judge him on what little we know.
This case can either be thrown out and the pokemon goes free, or we can set a new trial with a fresh picture to work with.
You can seek a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The court is very strict on what evidence types support a motion for a new trial. Criteria that must be met to base a new trial on newly discovered evidence are:
- The evidence is newly discovered and not known to you during trial
Your failure to learn of the evidence wasn't for lack of diligence
The evidence will probably mean a different result at a new trial
In the interest of justice it would be unlawful to continue this session and this trial in its current state!
